4.4.6 (N)The annual inspection by Special Type Equipment Monitoring Station for safety valve of air tank 02AAJ33 and 03AJB21 was not conducted as required, the inspection interval of safety valve should be defined according to pressure vessels regulation.
4.3.1 (O) The hazard identification without the thunder light strike according to the “Hazard Identification List”.
4.3.2 (O) The legal requirements of “Warning of Occupational Disease Harm of Working Place” and “Using License Management Regulation of Radioactive Isotope and Equipment” was not yet collected and identified.
4.3.3 (T) The OH&S Objective of working accident and lost of working time could be established for the purpose of OH&S performance evaluation.
4.4.6 (O) The “Environmental and Safety Agreement was not signed with toxic chemical provider Ningbo Shenghua as required.
4.4.6 (T) The requirement related to OH&S could be added into the “Supplier Investigation Form”.
4.4.6 (O) The copy of production and sales license for the PPE Personal Protection Equipment for special purpose was not yet collected.
4.4.6 (O) The operators of Molding Workshop do not wear earplug as required.
4.4.6 (T) The newly constructed storage room for toxic chemicals could be put into usage as early as possible.
4.4.6 (O) According to toxic chemical adding record dated Oct. 11, 2006 the signature of production supervisor was not available as required by documented procedure PS-M07 for 2000 g KCN adding.
4.4.6 (O) During the audit found several operators at the e-plating production line didn’t wear personal protection equipment (e.g. protective glasses, masks, etc.
4.4.6 (T) The ventilation of diesel oil tank storage room of canteen could be improved.
4.4.6 (T) The warning label pasted on the air-compressor could be marked in Chinese for better understanding by operators.
4.4.7 (T) The checking record of fire-extinguisher and fire hose could be prepared and pasted on the site for better monitoring purpose.
4.4.7 (T) The emergency light could be installed on the stairways/corridors of buildings.
4.4.7 (O) The emergency goods were not sufficiently provided for the first aid kit placed in the Molding Workshop.
4.4.7 (O) The first aid ISO-Amyl Nitrite for potential cyanide poisoning was not provided reasonably and without period of validaty.
最新回复
handsomewu (2006-10-18 11:09:26)
再就是,十幾個观察项或建议项就已經是最大的水份了
我相信:如果是認真、嚴格的審核的話,你的#些观察项或建议项就會變成不符合項!!
要不試試??
把你的观察项或建议项列出來,給大家評評看。
yangzi2001778 (2006-10-18 11:14:46)
QUOTE:
TUV的认证本就不如何,那现在哪家机构的认证就如何了,天下乌鸦都一般黑了。对于观察项和建议项,审核员同样要求我们采取纠正措施,在下次监审时会验证。
chlchl (2006-10-18 11:29:30)
sarah (2006-10-18 21:27:15)
yangzi2001778 (2006-10-19 08:42:54)
4.3.1 (O) The hazard identification without the thunder light strike according to the “Hazard Identification List”.
4.3.2 (O) The legal requirements of “Warning of Occupational Disease Harm of Working Place” and “Using License Management Regulation of Radioactive Isotope and Equipment” was not yet collected and identified.
4.3.3 (T) The OH&S Objective of working accident and lost of working time could be established for the purpose of OH&S performance evaluation.
4.4.6 (O) The “Environmental and Safety Agreement was not signed with toxic chemical provider Ningbo Shenghua as required.
4.4.6 (T) The requirement related to OH&S could be added into the “Supplier Investigation Form”.
4.4.6 (O) The copy of production and sales license for the PPE Personal Protection Equipment for special purpose was not yet collected.
4.4.6 (O) The operators of Molding Workshop do not wear earplug as required.
4.4.6 (T) The newly constructed storage room for toxic chemicals could be put into usage as early as possible.
4.4.6 (O) According to toxic chemical adding record dated Oct. 11, 2006 the signature of production supervisor was not available as required by documented procedure PS-M07 for 2000 g KCN adding.
4.4.6 (O) During the audit found several operators at the e-plating production line didn’t wear personal protection equipment (e.g. protective glasses, masks, etc.
4.4.6 (T) The ventilation of diesel oil tank storage room of canteen could be improved.
4.4.6 (T) The warning label pasted on the air-compressor could be marked in Chinese for better understanding by operators.
4.4.7 (T) The checking record of fire-extinguisher and fire hose could be prepared and pasted on the site for better monitoring purpose.
4.4.7 (T) The emergency light could be installed on the stairways/corridors of buildings.
4.4.7 (O) The emergency goods were not sufficiently provided for the first aid kit placed in the Molding Workshop.
4.4.7 (O) The first aid ISO-Amyl Nitrite for potential cyanide poisoning was not provided reasonably and without period of validaty.
lgy88 (2006-10-19 08:55:50)
lindaguo (2006-10-19 13:15:14)
lgy88 (2006-10-19 13:55:02)
yangzi2001778 (2006-10-19 15:00:25)
QUOTE:
ISO14001是自己推的,推OHSAS18001时请了咨询机构。genquan (2006-10-19 17:09:38)
arfeng.wang (2006-10-19 17:17:36)
lindaguo (2006-10-20 12:10:26)
QUOTE:
请问:请了咨询机构效果是否很好? 是知名的咨询机构吗?我公司想找一个好的咨询机构, 最好是外国机构. 请问你们出多少咨询费?liu16949 (2006-10-23 12:46:21)
QUOTE:
外国咨询机构就好了吗????//建议签咨询合同时注明咨询效果,并严格执行,,不是 外来的洋和尚都可以念经的啊,,
rebeccappan (2006-10-23 15:57:38)
forgrand (2006-10-23 16:03:45)
yangzi2001778 (2006-10-23 16:50:54)
QUOTE:
我们公司请了一个咨询公司,不过咨询师总共只来了4次,标准培训来了一次,文件培训来了一次,危险源识别来了一次,内审来了一次,主要还是我负责推行的.请咨询机构效果不一定好,关键是要找一个好的咨询师,内外部都可以.你可以先确定咨询师,再找咨询公司.咨询费用跟人天有关系,不好说.
liweifaith (2006-10-23 17:03:05)
appsun (2006-10-24 08:27:14)
十八子 (2006-10-24 10:18:06)
你将给咨询公司的费用全数去找一个经过认可的咨询师的话,保证效果超好!
十八子 (2006-10-24 10:22:34)